Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-12700F - 263 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €271.0 vs €513.87
- Up to 39% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-13900K - €1.18 vs €1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
60%
Price, €
€513.87
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €513.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
229
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€271
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €271 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |