Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-12700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-12700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 91 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-12700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - €273.0 vs €458.65
- Up to 38% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900KS - €1.31 vs €2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-12700F - 216 vs 208 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€273
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €273 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
61%
Price, €
€458.65
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €458.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |