Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Deathloop than Core i5-9400 - 198 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €136.36 vs €569.47
- Up to 73% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-13900F - €0.77 vs €2.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.88/FPS
26%
Price, €
€569.47
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €569.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
178
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €136.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |