Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3902 days newer than Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 30% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-3450 - 207 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€570
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €570 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |