Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4170 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 15% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-4170 - 547 vs 476 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €138.85 vs €396.72
- Up to 60% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i9-13900F - €0.29 vs €0.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
547
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
39.726027397260275%
Price, €
€396.72
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €396.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1643 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
476
87.0201096892139%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €138.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1643 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1101
40.32967032967033%
Multi-Core
2130
12.37005633312039%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Core i3-4170 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |