Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 5600G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 5600G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 631 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 5600G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 5600G - 216 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600G - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €249.0 vs €568.97
- Up to 52% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900F - €1.26 vs €2.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.63/FPS
47%
Price, €
€568.97
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €568.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
198
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€249
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600G |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |