Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1277 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 7 3700X - 134 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €133.76 vs €417.11
- Up to 65% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-13900F - €1.08 vs €3.11 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.11/FPS
34%
Price, €
€417.11
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €417.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2384 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €133.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |