Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-12400F - 158 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €151.67 vs €630.9
- Up to 74% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-13900 - €1.04 vs €3.99 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €630.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |