Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 3 3200G - 212 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €72.8 vs €260.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-11900KF - €0.42 vs €1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
34%
Price, €
€260.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €260.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
172
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |