Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than FX-4100 - 287 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €19.39 vs €495.99
- Up to 95% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-11900KF - €0.08 vs €1.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
4.624277456647399%
Price, €
€495.99
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for €495.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
250
87.10801393728222%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |