Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 39% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-4100 - 124 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €20.59 vs €260.99
- Up to 89% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-11900KF - €0.23 vs €2.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.1/FPS
10%
Price, €
€260.99
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €260.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |