Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2430 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Ready or Not than Pentium G3250 - 290 vs 239 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - €22.7 vs €278.89
- Up to 91% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-11900KF - €0.09 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
290
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
9%
Price, €
€278.89
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €278.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
239
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |