Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-4440 - 240 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €59.04 vs €283.62
- Up to 77% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-11900K - €0.27 vs €1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
22%
Price, €
€283.62
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €283.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9074 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
220
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |