Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Minecraft than Core i3-10320 - 825 vs 723 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €199.5 vs €276.3
- Up to 15% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-11900K - €0.28 vs €0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
825
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
84%
Price, €
€276.3
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €276.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
723
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |