Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-10100 - 568 vs 534 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €110.49 vs €283.62
- Up to 58% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-11900K - €0.21 vs €0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
568
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
42%
Price, €
€283.62
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €283.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18613 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
534
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18613 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |