Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 4214 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Phenom II X4 830 - 209 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - €27.62 vs €240.58
- Up to 85% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900K - €0.17 vs €1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
14%
Price, €
€240.58
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €240.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
165
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Core i9 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |