Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1089 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 21% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 401 vs 332 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 145 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10920X - 44 vs 24 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €415.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
70.1492537313433%
Multi-Core
9619
84.75636619966517%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 22 |
24 | Threads | 44 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 145 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |