Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 179 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i7-9700F - 356 vs 354 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €566.5 vs €645.91
- Up to 12% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10900X - €1.6 vs €1.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
356
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
88%
Price, €
€645.91
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for €645.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13427 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
354
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€566.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €566.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13427 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |