Buy on Amazon
€698.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3700 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom II X4 830 - 134 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €27.62 vs €698.89
- Up to 95% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - €0.24 vs €5.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Core i9-10900X X-Serie Prozessor 10 Kerne mit 3.7 GHz (bis 4,7 GHz mit Turbo Boost 3.0, LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Prozessor (999PNG)
Buy for €698.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
113
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 830 CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,8 GHz 6M 95W Sockel AM2+ Sockel AM3
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Deneb |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
