Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 219 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €129.97 vs €318.6
- Up to 55% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i9-10900KF - €0.65 vs €1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
44%
Price, €
€318.6
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €318.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18823 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
201
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |