Buy on Amazon
€247.91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom II X4 830 - 134 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €27.62 vs €247.91
- Up to 86% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-10900F - €0.26 vs €1.85 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.85/FPS
14%
Price, €
€247.91
11%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €247.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
105
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 830 CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,8 GHz 6M 95W Sockel AM2+ Sockel AM3
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Deneb |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
