Buy on Amazon
€247.91
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 23% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8350 - 192 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €155.88 vs €247.91
- Up to 22% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-10900F - €1.0 vs €1.29 per FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
77%
Price, €
€247.91
62%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €247.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-8350 CPU verwendet 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 4 GHz 8M 125W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
