Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 42% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i3-3220 - 132 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €25.06 vs €570.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i9-10900 - €0.27 vs €4.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €570 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Buy for €25.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |