Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 19% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 2400G - 63 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €155.46 vs €570.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900 - €2.93 vs €9.05 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €570 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
53
84%
Value, €/FPS
€2.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€155.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €155.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |