Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10105F - 361 vs 350 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €74.02 vs €371.95
- Up to 80% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10900 - €0.21 vs €1.03 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
361
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
20%
Price, €
€371.95
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €371.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
350
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |