Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 88 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - 182 vs 181 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €314.9 vs €339.95
- Up to 7% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10850K - €1.74 vs €1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.87/FPS
93%
Price, €
€339.95
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for €339.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17977 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €314.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |