Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-10400F - 136 vs 132 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - €91.6 vs €383.39
- Up to 76% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-9700KF - €0.69 vs €2.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.82/FPS
24%
Price, €
€383.39
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €383.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |