Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 189 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €91.6 vs €611.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 5950X - €0.75 vs €4.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-10400F - 130 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1979 minutes ago
Buy for €611 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1979 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |