Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 261 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Ryzen 3 3200G - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - €74.07 vs €353.68
- Up to 79% better value when playing Control than Core i7-9700K - €0.37 vs €1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
21%
Price, €
€353.68
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €353.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17282 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17283 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |