Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 5062 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €66.63 vs €528.89
- Up to 85% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-13900K - €0.37 vs €2.54 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 17% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i7-965 - 208 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
178
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.54/FPS
14%
Price, €
€528.89
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €528.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-965 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |