Buy on Amazon
€399.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1096
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1096
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3027 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-940XM - 183 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2920X 3.5GHz 12-Core 24 Gewinde 32MB Cache TR4 Sockel OEM, YD292XA8UC9AF
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-940XM
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940XM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
