Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 2969 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - €49.0 vs €173.76
- Up to 69% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-7700T - €0.29 vs €0.95 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-940 - 183 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-940 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Buy for €173.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-940 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |