Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 3188 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €49.0 vs €102.0
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 6% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i7-940 - 479 vs 450 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940 - 24 vs 8 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75743 minutes ago
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75745 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
447
38.074957410562185%
Multi-Core
1532
21.961009174311926%
Intel Core i7-940 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |