Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 1126 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 1% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i7-920XM - 107 vs 106 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€155.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Clarksfield | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |