Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 1170 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-10105T - 160 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105T
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - €216.6 vs €233.48
- Up to 6% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-8700 - €1.37 vs €1.46 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €233.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12175 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €216.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105T |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |