Key Differences
In short — Core i7-820QM outperforms Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-820QM is 298 days older than Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-820QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
