Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700T outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700T is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-8350 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - €155.88 vs €175.79
- Up to 10% better value when playing Control than Core i7-7700T - €0.78 vs €0.87 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €175.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700T | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |