Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €125.07 vs €314.36
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10900 - €0.83 vs €2.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-6700T - 154 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €125.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.04/FPS
40%
Price, €
€314.36
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €314.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |