Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €125.07 vs €273.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-12700F - €1.21 vs €2.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-6700T - 125 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
103
82%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €125.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Buy for €273 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |