Buy on Amazon
€579.7
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $346
Availability
MSRP in USD: $346
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i7-640M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3572 days newer than Core i7-640M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than Core i7-640M - 186 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640M - 24 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD RyzenTM 9 3900XT Prozessor (12 Kerne/24 Threads, 70MB Cache, bis zu 4,7 GHz Max Boost) - ohne Kühler, AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-640M
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
