Buy on Amazon
€151.36
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $332
Availability
MSRP in USD: $332
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3288 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 25 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than Core i7-640LM - 277 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 6 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
277
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80684I59400F CORE I5-9400F 2.90GHZ SKT1151 9MB CACHE BOXED :: (Komponenten> Prozessoren CPU)
Buy for €151.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
