Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 2336 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 14% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-620M - 139 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 20 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€329
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |