Buy on Amazon
€319.57
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $332
Availability
MSRP in USD: $332
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 3766 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 38% better in Rust than Core i7-620M - 211 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 20 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€319.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900KF (Basistakt: 3,70GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 125 Watt) Box
Buy for €319.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-620M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-620M or Core i9-10900KF
Rust, 1920 x 1080, High
122 FPS
€41.01/FPS
GeForce RTX 3090
Core i9-10900KF
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€5,003.16
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
