Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-4900MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than Core i7-4900MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4900MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 70% better in League of Legends than Core i7-4900MQ - 206 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4900MQ - 20 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €314.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4900MQ | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |