Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $380
Availability
MSRP in USD: $380
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 147 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1620 - 155 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 47 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
143
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
