Buy on Amazon
€49.68
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $346
Availability
MSRP in USD: $346
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4600M outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4600M is 313 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6300 - 124 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 37 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600M - 6 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
LANCHY AMD FX-Serie FX-6300 CPU verwendet 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,5 GHz 8M 95W Sockel AM3+
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-4600M
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
