Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €113.29 vs €314.9
- Up to 61% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i9-10900F - €0.43 vs €1.1 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than Core i7-3770S - 285 vs 262 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 20 vs 8 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
262
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19000 minutes ago
Buy for €314.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19000 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |