Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 2% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than FX-4100 - 111 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - €20.39 vs €106.31
- Up to 80% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-3770 - €0.19 vs €0.96 per FPS
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €106.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Buy for €20.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |