Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 2290 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-2920XM - 126 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€191.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |