Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Core i7-2820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2927 days newer than Core i7-2820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 76% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-2820QM - 130 vs 74 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2820QM - 16 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€430.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2820QM | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |