Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Core i7-2820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1214 days newer than Core i7-2820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 45 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Core i7-2820QM - 173 vs 168 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2820QM | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |